Never understood Christians blaming the Holocaust on atheism…..
Oh look! Two Catholic Nazis!
Benicio del Toro was originally cast, but he dropped out. Khan was originally played by Ricardo Montalban (who was also the “wrong” race).
I still don’t see a problem here.
I don’t understand the argument, “Well they didn’t cast a South Asian actor in the original…
Explain to me why a character who was originally written as a nordic superman and cast as a Latino must necessarily be of South Asian heritage and not, you know, however the filmmakers intended.
Reblog if you’re a Benedict Cumberbatch fan and you still think it was wrong to cast him as Khan because whitewashing is racist
Benicio del Toro was originally cast, but he dropped out. Khan was originally played by Ricardo Montalban (who was also the “wrong” race).
I still don’t see a problem here.
Why I turned Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS off
after only 8 minutes:
- A joke about how girls can’t drive/ handle complex machinery
- POC make an appearance! As glorified trash-workers
- You don’t blow on a burn, wind on a burn is incredibly painful
It must suck being you.
Ummm…
The Sarah Jane Adventures stole The Unquiet Dead and The Greatest Show in the Galaxy? Talk about poor writing.
Some atheists (admittedly, the more extreme ones) claim that Jesus Christ never existed. Richard Dawkins made this claim in “The God Delusion” and later retracted it when pressed in a debate by Professor John Lennox. Many more question the historical reliability of the gospels. This article…
Oh look, the intellectual coward is rehashing his same tired horseshit.
Fuck off, coward.
Don’t make jokes about rape
Don’t make jokes about incest
Don’t make jokes about cutting
Don’t make jokes about eating disorders
Don’t make jokes about suicide
Don’t make jokes about mental illness
It’s not funny
I have a better idea:
You don’t decide what I can say.
Questions About The Name of The Doctor
I am curious and want to hear opinions
1. How did the Doctor and Clara get from underground tunnels to the door to the tomb?
The tunnels led to a secret entrance to the tomb, but it really doesn’t matter.
2. How did Vastra and company get to the planet?
Also doesn’t matter.
3. When River said she was tethered to Clara - did this mean permanently?
I can’t imagine why it would.
4. If River is tethered to Clara, does this take away Clara’s freedom, ability to be her own character?
Why would it?
5. Why the heck didn’t anyone stop the GI???? There was no reason for them to stand there like lumps on a log to me. I think it’s poor writing but did anyone else see a reason for this?
Because then the story would be over too soon?
6. It appeared to me Clara jumped into the time stream because she believed she already had done it and therefore this must happen. Did anyone get another reason for this?
I thought it was because she wanted to save the Doctor.
7. I’ve seen people refer to Clara as a time lady now. This puzzles me as there was nothing indicating it other than she was on Gallifrey and there were many non Time Lords/Ladies living on Gallifrey. What’s the reason behind this assumption?
She was in Gallifrey at a time when non-Time Lords were prohibited.
8. The only connection behind the Clara’s is to save the Doctor. To me this means she does not remember any other Clara except maybe Clara Prime. Do you think that Clara Prime remembers anything of the other Clara’s or is just basing her jump decision on what the Doctor told her. Was she having flashbacks?
There’s no reason for Clara Prime to have memories from others.
9. This was a very River/Eleven shippy ep for me. I still don’t like that River’s entire life is all about the Doctor and every decision she makes seems to be about him but I like the concept of River’s character. I know many people ship Clara/Eleven I think they have a lot of chemistry but that seemed to not be the case in this ep. He seems to have far more affection for River in this ep and more of a friendship with Clara. I’m confused - thoughts?
None of that matters to me.
10. So if the John Hurt Doctor is not known as the Doctor, is he the Valeyard?
Time will tell.
10. Do you think that River’s story is finally put to rest so the Doctor can move on?
More or less.
Thanks for the input! I respect everyone’s opinions and this ep left me feeling like it was riddled with plot holes. I sometimes miss subtle nuances that other people catch.
No problem.
Is there seriously a fucking twitter dedicated to letting Dangan Ronpa fans know when the SA paywall is down so they can read updates? Just buy a fucking SA account, holy shit.
Seriously. It’s ten dollars. I’ve had mine for over a decade, and I don’t give a shit about Dangan Ronpa.
Good Reason News: sarafeminist: udonpoodles: gopandgirlythings: How is it that some of…
How is it that some of the same women who want to protect my right to have an abortion want to take away my right to own a gun?
Really?
I thought I could make choices?
Or can I only make the choices you want me to make?
Guns don’t kill people. Guns are inanimate objects.
That are used solely to kill people, stupid.
Abortions DO kill people or else 50 million people since 1973 would be alive today, but they’re not.
By that logic, how many people since the invention of the condom would be alive today if they weren’t brutally slaughtered by a rubber?
Guns are innocent, abortion is not.
Guns are weapons designed to kill people at the benefit of the gun manufactures and to the detriment of everyone who has to live around an asshole with a gun. That’s not innocent. That’s bordering on terrorism. Abortion is a medical procedure that causes no threat to you. You don’t know what you’re talking about, but what you’re supporting is, in fact, fascism.
If anything should be banned it’s abortion, not guns.
Nobody’s talking about a ban on anything, don’t you fucking reframe my argument. You wanna fight a straw man? Go ahead, just don’t drag me into it.
Oh and I’m not going to debate with you about abortion.I choose to debate about abortion anyway. Here’s why we have laws, at all: To protect people and society. Not only are fetuses not people, but if they were people, it wouldn’t matter, because their survival has no impact on any of the other people in society. Look, it’s like this:
Say the woman who lives three doors down from you is murdered on Monday. The woman two doors down from you is murdered on Tuesday and on Wednesday the woman next door to you is murdered. How are you going to feel on Thursday morning? Like you need some intervention to prevent your murder? Yeah, probably, you should be freaking out. You want the cops there to save you. Now say instead of being murdered they all got abortions in that order and you’re pregnant. How do you feel Thursday morning? Just fine, right? Why would their abortions impact you? What threat does it put upon you? How does it impact society? Who’s autonomy does that take away? Nobody’s, that’s who.
This post wasn’t comparing guns and abortion.
Of course it was, don’t be silly.
I was pointing out the fact that pro-choice anti-gun women are stupid for saying I should be able to do what I want with my body but I shouldn’t be able to own a gun to protect myself. What the heck?!
You really think people are saying you “shouldn’t be able to own a gun?” Are you sure they’re not actually saying “there ought to be stricter regulations about what kind of artillery can be sold for personal use and who can qualify to make that purchase based on the likelihood they’ll use it irresponsibly?” That’s why we don’t call it “gun ban,” we call it “gun control.”
TL:DR
OK, well, no one should ever respect you or your lousy opinion if you admit upfront that you’re too stupid to read two paragraphs. Fuck you.
I said I wasn’t going to debate abortion BECAUSE THAT WAS NOT THE POINT OF THIS POST.Funny how all the conservatives that saw this post immediately got the point, but you abortion supporters didn’t get it at all.Hmmm.hmmmm
Oh and a fetus is already a complete person. Completely new DNA, a full person totally unique from their parents and from any other human being who has ever and will ever live (unless they are an identical twin). Wearing a condom or any other bc method that prevents the conception of a human being is not killing a person because a sperm and an egg are only half of the equation in and of themselves, they have to combine to make a new person-which is why killing a fetus is killing a person. You did take biology in school, right? Whatever, like I’ve said a thousand times to all of your friends who have reblogged this post, I’m not comparing abortion to guns-I’m saying pro-choice anti-gun women are ridiculous.Too circular, didn’t bother untangling your knot of logical fallacies and sophomoric understanding of gestation.
Oh and a cancerous tumor is already a complete person. Completely new DNA, a full person totally unique from their parents and from any other human being who has ever and will ever live (unless they are an identical tumor). Any other cancer prevention method that prevents the creation of a human cancer cell is not killing a person because cancer cells are only half of the equation in and of themselves, they have to combine to make a new tumor-which is why killing a tumor is killing a person. You did take biology in school, right? Whatever, like I’ve said a thousand times to all of your friends who have reblogged this post, I’m not comparing cancer to guns-I’m saying gopandgirlythings is ridiculous.
A CANCER TUMOR IS NOT A FUCKING PERSON.
CANCER IS CANCER.
A FETUS IS A HUMAN BEING.
BRING ME A CANCER TUMOR THAT HAS A BEATING HEART, A BRAIN, A SPINAL CORD-OH AND WAS MADE FROM TWO PEOPLE HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. BRING IT TO ME AND I WILL BELIEVE YOUR BULLSHIT. IDIOTS. YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS.
So, a fetus without a heart is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a heart is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus without a brain is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a brain is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus without a spinal cord is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a spinal cord is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus who was not created via sexual intercourse is not a person and can be aborted.
A human who was not created via sexual intercourse is not a person and can be murdered.
Is that what you’re saying?Nope I was saying that cancer tumors are not fetuses. Fetuses are people from the beginning. It doesn’t matter how they are conceived, at what development level they are at-none of that. A cancer tumor is from the normal cells in ones body dividing uncontrollably. A fetus is from the sperm( not from the woman’s body) combining with the egg( in the woman’s body) to make a new human being.
Thanks for taking my argument so literally though-I recognize I will need to make my arguments simpler so you can understand them. -_-Seeing as you’re too thick to actually address arguments, and you get off on bullying people who dare to think differently, I’m not going to address your bullshit arguments. I will treat your ridiculousness with ridicule. I will point at you and laugh at your blithering ignorance and astounding hubris.
The pro-life movement is a joke. You are the punchline.
omg i so offended guise she said the pro-life movement is a joke and punchline omg going to renounce all my previous dislike of abortion now just say it woman choice fetuses are cancer cells everyone can go home won over LOL psych! I’m going to fight against abortion until the day I die. Don’t like it? I don’t give an ounce of cares.
No really, everything you post is hysterical! It’d be pathetic if you were serious, but you’re clearly just trolling.
LOL nope I’m as serious as a heart attack. I find you the hilarious one, equating fetuses to cancer cells. what a mess! That’s what’s pathetic.Heart attacks must be whimsical as hell in your little world. You’ve made it abundantly clear that you’re not interested in rational discussion. I mean, if you were actually serious, you’d address the core argument. You’re a troll, and a shitty one at that.
Wow you’re really unintelligent!
I already told you that you MISSED THE POINT OF MY ENTIRE ORIGINAL POST. Have you missed everything that I said earlier also? Did you not even see everything that I wrote in response to your bullshit? I don’t have time to refute your shitty arguments-I have a final to take in an hour and you’re not relevant enough for me to spend my time caring about. I’m not a troll, I know you wish I was, but I’m not. Come to my ask box some other day if you want to have a civil discussion about abortion because it’s obvious you’re just out to belittle and hurt simply because you disagree with my stances. I’ll talk to you when you become a mature adult. Toodles!
See? Typical excuses from a shitass troll.
Good Reason News: sarafeminist: udonpoodles: gopandgirlythings: How is it that some of…
How is it that some of the same women who want to protect my right to have an abortion want to take away my right to own a gun?
Really?
I thought I could make choices?
Or can I only make the choices you want me to make?
Guns don’t kill people. Guns are inanimate objects.
That are used solely to kill people, stupid.
Abortions DO kill people or else 50 million people since 1973 would be alive today, but they’re not.
By that logic, how many people since the invention of the condom would be alive today if they weren’t brutally slaughtered by a rubber?
Guns are innocent, abortion is not.
Guns are weapons designed to kill people at the benefit of the gun manufactures and to the detriment of everyone who has to live around an asshole with a gun. That’s not innocent. That’s bordering on terrorism. Abortion is a medical procedure that causes no threat to you. You don’t know what you’re talking about, but what you’re supporting is, in fact, fascism.
If anything should be banned it’s abortion, not guns.
Nobody’s talking about a ban on anything, don’t you fucking reframe my argument. You wanna fight a straw man? Go ahead, just don’t drag me into it.
Oh and I’m not going to debate with you about abortion.I choose to debate about abortion anyway. Here’s why we have laws, at all: To protect people and society. Not only are fetuses not people, but if they were people, it wouldn’t matter, because their survival has no impact on any of the other people in society. Look, it’s like this:
Say the woman who lives three doors down from you is murdered on Monday. The woman two doors down from you is murdered on Tuesday and on Wednesday the woman next door to you is murdered. How are you going to feel on Thursday morning? Like you need some intervention to prevent your murder? Yeah, probably, you should be freaking out. You want the cops there to save you. Now say instead of being murdered they all got abortions in that order and you’re pregnant. How do you feel Thursday morning? Just fine, right? Why would their abortions impact you? What threat does it put upon you? How does it impact society? Who’s autonomy does that take away? Nobody’s, that’s who.
This post wasn’t comparing guns and abortion.
Of course it was, don’t be silly.
I was pointing out the fact that pro-choice anti-gun women are stupid for saying I should be able to do what I want with my body but I shouldn’t be able to own a gun to protect myself. What the heck?!
You really think people are saying you “shouldn’t be able to own a gun?” Are you sure they’re not actually saying “there ought to be stricter regulations about what kind of artillery can be sold for personal use and who can qualify to make that purchase based on the likelihood they’ll use it irresponsibly?” That’s why we don’t call it “gun ban,” we call it “gun control.”
TL:DR
OK, well, no one should ever respect you or your lousy opinion if you admit upfront that you’re too stupid to read two paragraphs. Fuck you.
I said I wasn’t going to debate abortion BECAUSE THAT WAS NOT THE POINT OF THIS POST.Funny how all the conservatives that saw this post immediately got the point, but you abortion supporters didn’t get it at all.Hmmm.hmmmm
Oh and a fetus is already a complete person. Completely new DNA, a full person totally unique from their parents and from any other human being who has ever and will ever live (unless they are an identical twin). Wearing a condom or any other bc method that prevents the conception of a human being is not killing a person because a sperm and an egg are only half of the equation in and of themselves, they have to combine to make a new person-which is why killing a fetus is killing a person. You did take biology in school, right? Whatever, like I’ve said a thousand times to all of your friends who have reblogged this post, I’m not comparing abortion to guns-I’m saying pro-choice anti-gun women are ridiculous.Too circular, didn’t bother untangling your knot of logical fallacies and sophomoric understanding of gestation.
Oh and a cancerous tumor is already a complete person. Completely new DNA, a full person totally unique from their parents and from any other human being who has ever and will ever live (unless they are an identical tumor). Any other cancer prevention method that prevents the creation of a human cancer cell is not killing a person because cancer cells are only half of the equation in and of themselves, they have to combine to make a new tumor-which is why killing a tumor is killing a person. You did take biology in school, right? Whatever, like I’ve said a thousand times to all of your friends who have reblogged this post, I’m not comparing cancer to guns-I’m saying gopandgirlythings is ridiculous.
A CANCER TUMOR IS NOT A FUCKING PERSON.
CANCER IS CANCER.
A FETUS IS A HUMAN BEING.
BRING ME A CANCER TUMOR THAT HAS A BEATING HEART, A BRAIN, A SPINAL CORD-OH AND WAS MADE FROM TWO PEOPLE HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. BRING IT TO ME AND I WILL BELIEVE YOUR BULLSHIT. IDIOTS. YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS.
So, a fetus without a heart is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a heart is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus without a brain is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a brain is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus without a spinal cord is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a spinal cord is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus who was not created via sexual intercourse is not a person and can be aborted.
A human who was not created via sexual intercourse is not a person and can be murdered.
Is that what you’re saying?Nope I was saying that cancer tumors are not fetuses. Fetuses are people from the beginning. It doesn’t matter how they are conceived, at what development level they are at-none of that. A cancer tumor is from the normal cells in ones body dividing uncontrollably. A fetus is from the sperm( not from the woman’s body) combining with the egg( in the woman’s body) to make a new human being.
Thanks for taking my argument so literally though-I recognize I will need to make my arguments simpler so you can understand them. -_-Seeing as you’re too thick to actually address arguments, and you get off on bullying people who dare to think differently, I’m not going to address your bullshit arguments. I will treat your ridiculousness with ridicule. I will point at you and laugh at your blithering ignorance and astounding hubris.
The pro-life movement is a joke. You are the punchline.
omg i so offended guise she said the pro-life movement is a joke and punchline omg going to renounce all my previous dislike of abortion now just say it woman choice fetuses are cancer cells everyone can go home won over LOL psych! I’m going to fight against abortion until the day I die. Don’t like it? I don’t give an ounce of cares.
No really, everything you post is hysterical! It’d be pathetic if you were serious, but you’re clearly just trolling.
LOL nope I’m as serious as a heart attack. I find you the hilarious one, equating fetuses to cancer cells. what a mess! That’s what’s pathetic.
Heart attacks must be whimsical as hell in your little world. You’ve made it abundantly clear that you’re not interested in rational discussion. I mean, if you were actually serious, you’d address the core argument. You’re a troll, and a shitty one at that.
I just found a place to watch Classic Doctor Who. omfg
with subtitles but still
Wait, where can you watch Classic Who with subtitles??
All the subtitles are in brazilian portuguese, still want it? I can give you the link :)
Oh my. Suddenly I’m less interested, lol.
I’ll still take the link, though.
How is it that some of the same women who want to protect my right to have an abortion want to take away my right to own a gun?
Really?
I thought I could make choices?
Or can I only make the choices you want me to make?
Guns don’t kill people. Guns are inanimate objects.
That are used solely to kill people, stupid.
Abortions DO kill people or else 50 million people since 1973 would be alive today, but they’re not.
By that logic, how many people since the invention of the condom would be alive today if they weren’t brutally slaughtered by a rubber?
Guns are innocent, abortion is not.
Guns are weapons designed to kill people at the benefit of the gun manufactures and to the detriment of everyone who has to live around an asshole with a gun. That’s not innocent. That’s bordering on terrorism. Abortion is a medical procedure that causes no threat to you. You don’t know what you’re talking about, but what you’re supporting is, in fact, fascism.
If anything should be banned it’s abortion, not guns.
Nobody’s talking about a ban on anything, don’t you fucking reframe my argument. You wanna fight a straw man? Go ahead, just don’t drag me into it.
Oh and I’m not going to debate with you about abortion.I choose to debate about abortion anyway. Here’s why we have laws, at all: To protect people and society. Not only are fetuses not people, but if they were people, it wouldn’t matter, because their survival has no impact on any of the other people in society. Look, it’s like this:
Say the woman who lives three doors down from you is murdered on Monday. The woman two doors down from you is murdered on Tuesday and on Wednesday the woman next door to you is murdered. How are you going to feel on Thursday morning? Like you need some intervention to prevent your murder? Yeah, probably, you should be freaking out. You want the cops there to save you. Now say instead of being murdered they all got abortions in that order and you’re pregnant. How do you feel Thursday morning? Just fine, right? Why would their abortions impact you? What threat does it put upon you? How does it impact society? Who’s autonomy does that take away? Nobody’s, that’s who.
This post wasn’t comparing guns and abortion.
Of course it was, don’t be silly.
I was pointing out the fact that pro-choice anti-gun women are stupid for saying I should be able to do what I want with my body but I shouldn’t be able to own a gun to protect myself. What the heck?!
You really think people are saying you “shouldn’t be able to own a gun?” Are you sure they’re not actually saying “there ought to be stricter regulations about what kind of artillery can be sold for personal use and who can qualify to make that purchase based on the likelihood they’ll use it irresponsibly?” That’s why we don’t call it “gun ban,” we call it “gun control.”
TL:DR
OK, well, no one should ever respect you or your lousy opinion if you admit upfront that you’re too stupid to read two paragraphs. Fuck you.
I said I wasn’t going to debate abortion BECAUSE THAT WAS NOT THE POINT OF THIS POST.Funny how all the conservatives that saw this post immediately got the point, but you abortion supporters didn’t get it at all.Hmmm.hmmmm
Oh and a fetus is already a complete person. Completely new DNA, a full person totally unique from their parents and from any other human being who has ever and will ever live (unless they are an identical twin). Wearing a condom or any other bc method that prevents the conception of a human being is not killing a person because a sperm and an egg are only half of the equation in and of themselves, they have to combine to make a new person-which is why killing a fetus is killing a person. You did take biology in school, right? Whatever, like I’ve said a thousand times to all of your friends who have reblogged this post, I’m not comparing abortion to guns-I’m saying pro-choice anti-gun women are ridiculous.Too circular, didn’t bother untangling your knot of logical fallacies and sophomoric understanding of gestation.
Oh and a cancerous tumor is already a complete person. Completely new DNA, a full person totally unique from their parents and from any other human being who has ever and will ever live (unless they are an identical tumor). Any other cancer prevention method that prevents the creation of a human cancer cell is not killing a person because cancer cells are only half of the equation in and of themselves, they have to combine to make a new tumor-which is why killing a tumor is killing a person. You did take biology in school, right? Whatever, like I’ve said a thousand times to all of your friends who have reblogged this post, I’m not comparing cancer to guns-I’m saying gopandgirlythings is ridiculous.
A CANCER TUMOR IS NOT A FUCKING PERSON.
CANCER IS CANCER.
A FETUS IS A HUMAN BEING.
BRING ME A CANCER TUMOR THAT HAS A BEATING HEART, A BRAIN, A SPINAL CORD-OH AND WAS MADE FROM TWO PEOPLE HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. BRING IT TO ME AND I WILL BELIEVE YOUR BULLSHIT. IDIOTS. YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS.
So, a fetus without a heart is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a heart is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus without a brain is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a brain is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus without a spinal cord is not a person and can be aborted.
A human without a spinal cord is not a person and can be murdered.A fetus who was not created via sexual intercourse is not a person and can be aborted.
A human who was not created via sexual intercourse is not a person and can be murdered.
Is that what you’re saying?Nope I was saying that cancer tumors are not fetuses. Fetuses are people from the beginning. It doesn’t matter how they are conceived, at what development level they are at-none of that. A cancer tumor is from the normal cells in ones body dividing uncontrollably. A fetus is from the sperm( not from the woman’s body) combining with the egg( in the woman’s body) to make a new human being.
Thanks for taking my argument so literally though-I recognize I will need to make my arguments simpler so you can understand them. -_-Seeing as you’re too thick to actually address arguments, and you get off on bullying people who dare to think differently, I’m not going to address your bullshit arguments. I will treat your ridiculousness with ridicule. I will point at you and laugh at your blithering ignorance and astounding hubris.
The pro-life movement is a joke. You are the punchline.
omg i so offended guise she said the pro-life movement is a joke and punchline omg going to renounce all my previous dislike of abortion now just say it woman choice fetuses are cancer cells everyone can go home won over LOL psych! I’m going to fight against abortion until the day I die. Don’t like it? I don’t give an ounce of cares.
No really, everything you post is hysterical! It’d be pathetic if you were serious, but you’re clearly just trolling.
